Professor Mike Carrillo teaching a class.

Teaching & Learning Center

Supporting teaching through innovation

The Teaching & Learning Center supports academic excellence by inspiring and encouraging innovation in pedagogical practices and technology.

We provide instructional design and ongoing support for Warrington’s online and hybrid graduate and undergraduate courses.

About the center

Following the guidelines for accreditation of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, we help faculty develop and maintain assessment strategies to measure students’ mastery of learning objectives. We also support instructors in making adjustments to ensure our students are well prepared for careers as leaders in business and academia. Finally, we serve on a variety of college- and university-level committees that are dedicated to excellence in teaching and learning.

The Teaching & Learning Center keeps current with technological and pedagogical trends, and has presented and published on a variety of topics as a team and in collaboration with Warrington’s instructors. Topics include experiential and excursion learning, how to leverage video to drive learning, and how to incorporate active and flipped learning. We are committed to helping Warrington’s instructors foster collaborative and effective online learning environments for students.

Professor Megan Mocko in class working with a student.

The Warrington College of Business has a robust assurance of learning program. The AACSB standards for assurance of learning requires that “the school uses a well documented, systematic process to develop, monitor, evaluate, and revise the substance and delivery of the curricula of degree programs and assesses the impact of the curricula on learning.”

AACSB requires that faculty have “ownership of, and a deep involvement in” the process of assuring that students in our programs are learning. Additional constituents influence the college’s process, including students, alumni, advisory boards, and employers. Data collected through this process is analyzed by program committees and used to fuel conversations on continuous improvement.

Each degree program has a defined plan for monitoring learning objectives. The faculty lead assigned to each program ensures the review process is implemented.

A group of students working together on an in-class activity.

Assurance of learning per degree

Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration and Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
Faculty lead: Aditi Mukherjee Instructional Associate Professor
Committee: Undergraduate Curriculum

Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration and Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
Faculty lead: Aditi Mukherjee Instructional Associate Professor
Committee: Undergraduate Curriculum

Assurance of Learning Assessment Measure Guidance – BSBA/BABA

Program overview

The Bachelor of Science in Business Administration curriculum combines a business major with upper-division non-business courses and/or foreign languages. In addition to taking core business courses, BSBA students choose one of six majors: general business, economics, finance, information systems, management, or marketing.

The Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration curriculum combines business fundamentals with an outside area of interest. In addition to taking core business courses, general studies majors choose an area of specialization from over 70 disciplines, including foreign language, mass communications, international studies, travel and tourism, criminology, and exercise and sports sciences.

Program goals and objectives
  1. Demonstrate competency in and across business disciplines
    1. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of elements of economics, finance, accounting, marketing, operations management, organizational behavior, business law, information technology, business statistics, and social responsibility.
    2. Demonstrate proficiency in the use of business-related software applications.
    3. Assessment Method: Stand-alone exam (ETS-B)/Course-embedded measure (QMB3250)
  2. Apply appropriate problem solving and decision-making skills
    1. Specify and implement a framework for identifying a business problem and develop alternative solutions and a set of evaluation criteria.
    2. Assess the outcomes of a course of action and make appropriate adjustments.
    3. Assessment Method: Stand-alone exam (ETS-B)/Course-embedded measure (QMB3250/MAN4504)
  3. Possess effective communication skills.
    1. Write business documents clearly, concisely, and analytically.
    2. Speak in groups and in public clearly, concisely, and analytically, with appropriate use of visual aids.
    3. Assessment Method: Course-embedded measure (FIN3403/GEB 3213/GEB 3218)
  4. Appreciate the ethical aspects of business.
    1. Define the ethical responsibilities of business organizations and identify relevant ethical issues.
    2. Assessment Method: Stand-alone exam (ETS-B)/Course-embedded measure (MAR3023/BUL4310/MAN3025)
  5. Possess a global perspective on business.
    1. Describe the key components of the business environment that vary across countries and understand how these differences present challenges and opportunities for the conduct of business.
    2. Possess awareness of cultural differences and how these differences affect business decisions.
    3. Assessment Method: Stand-alone exam (ETS-B)/Course-embedded measure (MAR3023/ GEB3373)
  6. Understand the principles of groups, teams, managers and leaders.
    1. Identify characteristics and roles of groups and teams.
    2. Identify characteristics and roles of managers and leaders.
    3. Assessment Method: Course-embedded measure (MAN3025)
Assessment measures

Two types of assessment measures will be used to assess the Assurance of Learning program goals and objectives:

  1. Stand-alone testing CAPSIM every term.
  2. Course-embedded measures that include a writing assignment from GEB 3213, a speaking assignment from GEB 3218, selected exam or quiz questions from QMB 3250, MAN 4504, BUL 4310, MAR 3023, and MAN 3025, discussion board writings from FIN 3403, and selected exam questions and case analysis from GEB 3373.

The following information outlines the methods used for each measure.

Stand-alone testing

All students in the BSBA and BABA programs are required to take the Capsim Modular-XM as part of their final core course in business. Capsim Modular-XM™ is a flexible exam that measures student learning outcomes and streamlines reporting for accreditation. Learning outcomes measurement spans across a variety of subject areas and learning objectives, built on a modern assessment platform focused on exam integrity. Participants receive randomized data sets in their exam, creating a unique experience from user to user. These data sets are used in formulating answers to individual items. After their exam, users have access to a self-directed individual development plan builder to identify areas for improvement, as well as create the steps to achieve their stated goals.

Items

Modular-XM’s item pool is created by a panel of Subject Matter Experts across a variety of domains. These items are then peer-reviewed for accuracy. The University of Florida uses a standardized version of Modular-XM with 76 items. The items focus on the subject areas and learning objectives.

Course-embedded measures

GEB3213

The persuasive writing assignment in GEB3213 assesses students’ abilities to respond persuasively to a set context and audience, making the case for a specific goal. The students need to address the reader’s need or problem strategically, establish the desired relationship with the reader, project a professional ethos, and motivate for the desired outcome using logical, persuasive reasoning and intelligent support for all claims. In addition, the assignment should be written clearly, concisely, and coherently, and in correct and appropriate document format.

The Communications faculty will score these presentations using the GEB3213-Persuasive Memo Grading Sheet (Appendix A). They will provide the completed score sheets along with some representative samples of student work to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office for compilation and storage.

GEB3218

The persuasive presentation assignment in GEB3218 requires students to deliver and structure an internal business presentation that persuades the audience to adopt the presenter’s proposal or recommendation. Students must determine the purposes for presenting, analyze the audience, and use appropriate and compelling information that is logically structured. They need to use well constructed PowerPoint slides and demonstrate a number of delivery skills. The assignment tests their ability to design compelling and persuasive presentations and deliver them dynamically.

The Communications faculty will score these presentations using the GEB3218-Persuasive Assessment-Rubric (Appendix B). They will provide the completed score sheets along with some representative samples of student work to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office for compilation and storage.

QMB3250

In Fall 2010, the instructor will begin using the MyStatLab assignment and quiz manager that is offered with Pearson Learning textbooks. Several of the assignments deployed through MSL will involve multiple-version computer assignments using Excel. These assignments will be graded on three quizzes worth approximately 2% of the course grade per quiz. On each quiz there will be 5 questions related to the assignment, and the responses to these questions will form the basis for assessing Goal 1b.

There will be nine of these quizzes over the semester. On the other 6 quizzes (the ones that do not require Excel work), many of the questions will involve a choice of statistical technique and a conclusion about what action to take. If there are two such questions per quiz, there will be 10-12 over the entire semester. The responses to these questions will form the basis for assessing Goals 2a and 2b.Student scores on the quiz questions will be collected by the professor and provided to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office. This data will be compiled for storage and review by the Undergraduate Committee faculty.

MAN4504

In MAN 4504, students learn how to appropriately identify and frame problems in Operations and Supply Chain Management, to use or create criteria for evaluating decision alternatives available for these problems, and to identify the courses of action available for solving these problems. The problems covered in the course are some of the basic problems involved in effectively designing and managing production systems and managing supply chains. Students learn to solve these problems by utilizing one or more of the qualitative and/or quantitative techniques that are regularly used by operations and supply chain managers. Finally, students are taught to evaluate and adjust as necessary the solutions found to these problems by using post-solution evaluation procedures used by operations and supply chain managers.

There are four exams in the course. Students are allowed to miss one exam. Each exam will have questions seeking to assess how well students are progressing towards achieving the Assurance of Learning goals mapped to this course. On each of the four exams there will be a minimum of eight questions that will be collected for Assurance of Learning purposes.

The professor will map the questions to either Goal 2a or Goal 2b, and provide exams along with the map to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office. Exam data will then be compiled for storage and review by the Undergraduate Committee faculty.

Their own thoughts on the subject. In addition to learning how to write more effectively, these assignments will help students understand how financial concepts are related to events in the real world, as well as expose them to current questions or concerns relevant to the course, their lives, and their future careers.

MAR3023

The ethical aspects of business requirement states that students be able to define and recognize ethical responsibilities of business organizations. The embedded assessment of this requirement comprises 8-10 multiple-choice exam questions on issues of ethics and corporate social responsibility, topics that are discussed in both the text and lectures. The pertinent questions are a portion of a larger 60-item exam and emphasize application of ethical concepts in Goal 4.

The global perspective requirement in Goal 5a states that students understand how the business environment, including culture, differs across countries. The embedded assessment of this requirement comprises 8-10 multiple choice exam questions on global issues that relate to lecture and text materialon international marketing. The pertinent questions are a portion of a larger 60-item exam and emphasize application of global and cross-cultural concepts.

Student scores on the exam questions will be collected by the professor and provided to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office. This data will be compiled for storage and review by the Undergraduate Committee faculty.

BUL4310

In BUL4310 (Legal Environment of Business), students learn about numerous areas of business law and the legal environment of business. This course is intended to help students develop an understanding of the law, particularly insofar as the law responds to or affects business. The course evaluates numerous business law situations as well as the role of attorneys and businesspersons. A basic grasp of legal reasoning and the legal approach to problem solving is useful in many aspects of life; numerous subjects are covered, including contracts, torts, agency, employment, and business organizations (e.g., corporations and partnerships). The course offers a global perspective on the business environment, including laws and culture differing across countries. The course incorporates, throughout its coverage, ethical concerns about law and business. There will be 15-20 multiple-choice questions from exams used to assess Goal 4a, which is to appreciate the ethical aspects of business and thereby do as follows: Define the ethical responsibilities of business organizations and identify relevant ethical issues.

Student scores on the exam questions will be collected by the professor and provided to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office. This data will be compiled for storage and review by the Undergraduate Committee faculty.

GEB3373

In GEB3373 students learn about the challenges and necessary adaptations required to succeed in business in host countries with differing cultural, political, legal, and economic systems. Issues focusing on the importance of the level of development and the chosen path for improvement will also be featured. Assessment of the success in attaining the targeted expertise includes 15-25 multiple choice exam questions distributed over multiple exams on each topic. Case analyses where the student must recognize issues and make appropriate recommendations for resolving problems are also required and the students will be asked to review and comment appropriately on issues raised in selected videos.

Student scores on the exam questions will be collected by the professor and provided to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office. This data will be compiled for storage and review by the Undergraduate Committee faculty.

MAN3025

MAN3025 covers all areas of Management (17 topics). The topics of Groups/Teams and Power/Influence/Leadership are each discussed in 1 to 2 lectures. During Spring Semester,approximately ten multiple choice questions will be written to assess Goal 6a: Identify characteristics and roles of groups and teams. Similarly, during Spring Semester, approximately ten multiple choice questions will be written to assess Goal 6b: Identify characteristics and roles of managers and leaders. Along with additional questions for Goal 4a: Define the ethical responsibilities of business organization’s and identify relevant ethical issues.

Student scores on the exam questions will be collected by the professor and provided to the Teaching Excellence & Assessment office. This data will be compiled for storage and review by the Undergraduate Committee faculty.

All data from the course-embedded measures will be stored in a secure location and used for making decisions about future changes or adaptations to the undergraduate program. The Undergraduate Committee will meet in the Fall term to discuss the data collected and to make recommendations for changes.

Standards

The Undergraduate Committee adopted the following standard for assessing individual students:

  • Less than 75% of items answered correctly (does not meet standards)
  • 75-89% of items answered correctly (meets standards)
  • 90-100% of items answered correctly (exceeds standards)

The faculty goal for CEMs is to have 80% of students across various courses meet or exceed standards for a particular learning objective.

Appendix A

CriteriaRatings
Content: well-selected details, reader-focused content, strong evidence, analytical approach, research convincingExceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
Purpose: recommendation frontloaded, reader briefed, argument consistent, conclusion summative (action, goodwill)Exceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
Reader focus: briefing, purpose statement, preview, scan-able information, benefit, “you”-attitudeExceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
Organization: introduction complete, format appropriate, layout clear, important elements highlighted, scan-able information, strong visuals if appropriate, summative conclusionsExceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
Clarity: active voice preferred, clear agents, strong verbs, specific pronouns and referents.Exceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
Concision: precise dictation, concise expression of ideas, relevant details only, syntax strongExceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
CohesionExceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
Grammar and mechanics: readable and correct proseExceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts
Persuasive approaches: establishes need, supports solution, creates credibility/trust, focuses on reader needs, builds solid logic, counters potential objections, justifies actionsExceeds expectations: 2.0 pts
Meets expectations: 1.0 pts
Does not meet expectations: 0.0 pts

Appendix B

AACSB Assessment

Speaker____ Major____ Topic____

Below standardsBelow standardsBelow standardsMeets standardsExceeds standards
New rubric categoriesOld rubric categories
  • Introduction – Objective, purpose, or final recommendation (clearly stated)

Master of Accounting
Faculty Lead: Jill Goslinga — Grant Thornton Faculty Fellow, Instructional Associate Professor
Committee: FSOA Curriculum

Bachelor of Science in Accounting
Faculty lead: Jill Goslinga — Grant Thornton Faculty Fellow, Instructional Associate Professor
Committee: Fisher School of Accounting Curriculum

MBA
Faculty lead: Gwendolyn Lee – Chester C. Holloway Professor
Committee: MBA Curriculum

Master of Science in Information Systems and Operations Management
Faculty lead: Kenny Cheng – John B. Higdom Eminent Scholar Chair, Professor
Committee members: Asoo Vakharia, Haldun Aytug, Praveen Pathak, Anand Paul

Master of Science in Entrepreneurship (The Thomas S. Johnson Program)
Faculty lead: Alex Settles – Clinical Associate Professor
Committee: MSE Curriculum

Master of International Business
Faculty lead: Brian Gendreau – Hough Professor
Committee members: Sean Limon, Ana Portocarrero, Amanda Phalin

Master of Science in Management
Faculty lead: Gwen Lee – Chester C. Holloway Professor
Committee members: Sean Limon, Lindy Archambeau, Ana Portocarrero

MS Marketing
Faculty lead: Lyle Brenner – Jack Faricy Professor, Associate Professor
Committee members: MS Marketing Curriculum

Master of Science in Finance
Faculty lead: David Brown – BB&T Professor of Free Enterprise, Associate Professor
Committee members: Carolyn Brown, Brian Gendreau

Master of Science in Real Estate
Faculty lead: David Ling — Ken & Linda McGurn Professor
Committee members: MS in Real Estate Curriculum

Ph.D. programs
Faculty lead: Chris Janiszewski – JCPenney Professor of Marketing
Committee: PhD Curriculum

DBA
Faculty lead: Phil Podsakoff – Hyatt and Cici Brown Chair of Business
Committee: DBA Curriculum

PhD Teaching Award

The Warrington College of Business recognizes excellence in the classroom through the PhD Teaching Award. This award is offered to up to three Ph.D. students each academic year who are teaching a course for which they have sole responsibility.

Be sure to observe the following deadlines to submit your award documents:

  • If you are teaching during the Summer 2025 through Spring 2026 semesters, submit your award documents by June 1, 2026.

To be considered for the award, you are required to submit the following to the PhD Teaching Award Committee:

1. Course syllabus. To ensure that your syllabus is complete, be sure to review the University of Florida Syllabus Policy.

2. Course site URL. To ensure that your course site is complete, be sure to review the University of Florida Required Minimal Canvas Usage Policy.

3. Statement of your teaching philosophy. When crafting your 1-2-page single-spaced philosophy, consider ways to include tangible and specific examples of how you put your pedagogical philosophies into practice.

4. Midcourse evaluation. This evaluation should be administered via GatorEvals around the midpoint of your term (i.e., 6-8 weeks into the semester or 4 weeks into the mod if you are teaching a module course). See Midterm Evaluations for additional information on the evaluation, including how to opt-in. See Instructor Reports for information on how to generate a report of your midcourse evaluations.

5. Recording of one entire class session. You will need to provide a link (or links, if your class session is split into multiple recordings) to your recording. To ensure that your video is accessible during the award selection period, be sure to upload your video(s) to a hosting (Dropbox, OneDrive, or Google Drive) or sharing (YouTube or Vimeo) service.

As you prepare to record a class session, remember that recording technology can fail. Be sure to review your recording(s) to ensure the audio and video elements are of a high quality and to record early enough in the semester that you can re-record if necessary.

Note: You will want to provide advanced notice to your students that they will be captured in a recording in case they have a personal or cultural reason to not want to be filmed or photographed.

6. Official final course evaluations. These evaluations will be administered online through GatorEvals and will be available shortly after the semester that you teach. You should only submit the final course evaluations for the semester that you are submitting the award documents for. See Instructor Reports for information on how to generate a report of your final course evaluations.

7. Section(s) GPAs. Provide a breakdown of the final course GPAs for your students.

8. Self-evaluation of your midcourse and final course evaluations. This 1-2-page document should summarize what you learned from both of your course evaluation. Your reflection does not need to include quoted student comments, as those will be submitted and reviewed separately.

First, you should include what you learned from your midcourse evaluation after you read through the responses. Be sure to include any resulting modifications or improvements you made to your course or teaching during the second half of the semester.

Second, you should include what you learned from your final course evaluations. This portion of your self-evaluation should include any patterns you saw in the student feedback. You should also touch upon how well your midcourse improvements were received and what you would incorporate going forward.

Incomplete packages will not be considered, so be sure to include all required materials. You do not need to include any additional materials in your award application. Be sure to clearly label each document you submit to support the awards committee’s review process.

Note: If you have previously won a Ph.D. Teaching Award, you are ineligible to reapply for one year after receiving the award. Please submit all documents as a single zipped archive to the Teaching & Learning Center. Contact the Teaching & Learning Center if you have questions. We look forward to receiving your submissions.

Summer 2024-Spring 2025:

  • Zhefan Huang (MAN4301), Sujin Park (MAR3503), and Alan Sohn (TAX5025 & TAX5027)

Read more about Zhefan, Sujin and Alan, and their teaching experience in the Warrington News.

Teaching and Learning Center staff gathered around a table in their office space.

How can we help?

The professionals in the Teaching & Learning Center are available to assist faculty and academic professionals in their curricular needs. Reach out to us:

Teaching & Learning Center
Bryan Hall 212
352-273-0730